Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. . Seahorn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1ConcurrenceClark, C. J.

Indictment for selling liquor. The defendants were both convicted, and appeal. The defendants are husband and wife. Both were indicted and convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor.

The evidence on the part of the State tends to show that the defendants kept a house of questionable repute; that the prosecuting witness, Lawrence, in company with another, visited the house, and that the feme defendant, in the presence of her husband, sold Lawrence two pints of whiskey; that at the same time the defendants gave Lawrence, who was posing as a whiskey drummer, two orders, one for 24…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. State v. . NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  5. Smith v. MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. CauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API