McKnett v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
2Per curiam
We are of the opinion the conclusion reached in the original opinion is correct. The authorities cited therein, which need no repetition here, demonstrate that the matter of jurisdiction is dependent upon section 5681, Code 1923, which for convenience is here reproduced: “Whenever, either by common law or the statutes of another state, a cause of action, either upon contract, or in tort, has arisen in such other state against any person or corporation, such cause of action shall be enforeible in the courts of this state, in any county in which jurisdiction of the defendant can be…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Murnan v. Wabash Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.