St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Lane
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
This is a suit for damages alleged to have accrued to appellee by reason of a failure to furnish sufficient cars for a cattle shipment, and failure to furnish proper and suitable pens and facilities for receiving the cattle and caring for them, and negligence in loading and rough handling while in the cars. The suit was filed by appellee against the San Benito Rio Grande Valley Railway Company and the St. Louis, Brownsville Mexico Railway Company and was submitted on special issues to a jury, and on the answers thereto judgment was rendered in favor of appellee as against the San Benito Rio…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- L. L.F. Ins. Co. v. . R., W. O.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Dublin v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
- Bird v. RailroadsTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- London & Lancashire Fire Insurance v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Texas Utilities Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- England v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932