Legal Opinion

Presley v. Szerdi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 8, 1998No. Nos. 97-1777, 97-1867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the May 7 and May 15, 1997 orders which compel arbitration. Based on the record before it, the trial court properly determined that there was no fraud pertaining to the inclusion of .the arbitration clause in the Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect. See Passerrello v. Robert L. Lipton, Inc., 690 So.2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Ronbeck Constr. Co. v. Savanna Club Corp., 592 So.2d 344, 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Appellants’ theory of mutual mistake as a basis for rescission was not raised below and therefore cannot be raised on appeal. See Kozich v. Hartford Ins. Co.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. McDaniel v. BerhalterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Royal Caribbean Cruises v. UNIVERSAL EMP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Kozich v. Hartford Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Passerrello v. Robert L. Lipton, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sinatra v. BusselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API