Legal Opinion
Durham v. Guest
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 2007No. 26,123PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} This case comes to us on the district court’s dismissal of a complaint under Rule 1 — 012(B)(6) NMRA. We affirm the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
{2} Based on the facts alleged in the complaint and the attached exhibits, we provide a general background of the case. Other facts will be added in the context of the issues as they are discussed. Plaintiffs, Jamie and Travis Durham, were insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Plaintiffs’ uninsured motorist (UM) coverage limit on the policy was $25,000 per…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Fernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buck v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Durham v. GuestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Guest v. BerardinelliNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Mosley v. TitusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.