Legal Opinion

State v. Annable

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2011No. 94775PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larry A. Jones, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Richard Annable, appeals his convictions. We affirm.

I. Procedural History and Facts

{¶ 2} In October 2009, Annable was indicted on one count of theft and 30 counts of practicing medicine without a license. The case proceeded to a jury trial. At the conclusion of the state’s case, the defense made a Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal, which was denied. The defense presented evidence, and at the conclusion of its case, renewed its Crim.R. 29 motion; the motion was again denied.

{¶ 3} The jury found Annable guilty of theft and 12 counts of practicing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. WillanOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. GreenshieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. McGlothanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Townsend v. CalabreseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API