Legal Opinion

Kortman v. Mason

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1929No. 19723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the common pleas court of Tulsa county denying plaintiff in error’s motion to vacate an order appointing a receiver.

Petition in error presents as error the action of the trial court in the appointment of the receiver and the refusal to vacate such appointment.

We are unable to review the • ord'er of which the plaintiff in error complains, for the reason the plaintiff in error attempts to present the record by transcript and not by bill of exceptions or case-made. Only alleged errors appearing on the face of the record proper may be reviewed by transcript.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Homeland Realty Co. v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Denson v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Dixon v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API