MacIntosh v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtOrfinger, J.
Damien 0. Macintosh appeals, his five-year sentence.for. grand theft and assault. Although the sentence was authorized by the Criminal Punishment. Code, section 921.002, Florida Statutes (2014), Macintosh correctly argues that the trial' court violated his due process rights by basing his sentence, at least in part, on uncharged or dismissed offenses. See Crouse v. State, 101 So.3d 901, 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding that while sentencing court may consider “any and all information that reasonably might bear on the proper sentence,” it may not consider “unsubstantiated allegations of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yisrael v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Reese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- McGill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Crouse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marc Chantele Williams v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Shelko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Akeen Kadoni Paul v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Shelko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019