Legal Opinion

In re Toepel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1905No. Calendar No. 20,859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Habeas corpus proceedings by Otto T. Toepel to obtain his release from the county jail of Wayne county.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The petitioner sued out a writ of habeas corpus to review a sentence of Judge Donovan, imposed upon the petitioner for an alleged contempt of court. The questions involved relate to the jurisdiction to punish the petitioner for the act recited.

The petitioner is coroner of the county of Wayne, and entitled, as such, to hold inquests upon dead bodies. 3 Comp. Laws, § 11832. By the provisions -of section 11828, 3 Comp. Laws, the expense of an inquest upon the dead body of a stranger shall be paid by the State if the justice or coroner shall certify that, to the best of his knowledge and belief,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wall v. TrumbullMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. State ex rel. Haughey v. RyanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Locke v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Lachance v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HoffmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Dorrien v. HazeltineWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In re LowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Goodspeed v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API