Legal Opinion

State v. Troughton

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1994No. 20972PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Donald Troughton appeals from a district court’s order denying his motion to suppress physical evidence on a controlled substance charge. He also raises issues regarding evidence of the quantity of the controlled substance and the court’s refusal to give certain jury instructions. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Troughton was found guilty by a jury of felony possession of methamphetamine. I.C. § 37-2732(c)(l). In separate, but joined, actions, he was also found guilty by the same jury of three misdemeanors: possession of drug paraphernalia,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Salinas v. VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. EarpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. RogersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. GroceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API