State v. Troughton
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Donald Troughton appeals from a district court’s order denying his motion to suppress physical evidence on a controlled substance charge. He also raises issues regarding evidence of the quantity of the controlled substance and the court’s refusal to give certain jury instructions. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Troughton was found guilty by a jury of felony possession of methamphetamine. I.C. § 37-2732(c)(l). In separate, but joined, actions, he was also found guilty by the same jury of three misdemeanors: possession of drug paraphernalia,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Salinas v. VierstraIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. EarpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RogersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. GroceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.