Railway Audit & Inspection Co. v. Pendleton
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
Plaintiff is engaged in conducting a general detective agency, to carry on and direct investigations, conduct searches, discover evidence, examine into causes to ascertain underlying facts connected with complex prob lems, and to do all things incidental and necessary thereto. Defendant, at one time, owned and conducted a corporation, known as Forrest C. Pendleton, Inc., which was engaged in the same kind of business as was plaintiff, and which, through the name and influence of defendant, enjoyed a large and profitable business in New Orleans and throughout the state.
Plaintiff acquired all…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blanchard v. HaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- May v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
- Adams v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Barrera v. CiolinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Desselle v. PetrossiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Plunkett v. D & L Family Pharmacy, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.