Legal Opinion
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Doe
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 29, 2010No. Nos. 3D09-2687, 3D09-2393PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTHENBERG, Judge.
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. (“RCCL”) seeks certiorari relief from: (1) an order granting the plaintiffs, Jane Doe and her minor daughter Sara Doe, leave to amend their complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages; and (2) an order denying, in part, RCCL’S motion for a protective order. We grant RCCL’s petitions; quash the trial court’s order granting the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to assert a punitive damages claim; and quash portions of the trial court’s order regarding the discovery issues.
The relevant evidence is as follows. At approximately 2:05…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Altosino v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Henn v. SandlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Kraft Gen. Foods, Inc. v. RosenblumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. DoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Varnedore v. CopelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Coronado Condominium Ass'n v. CorteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Fetlar, LLC v. SuarezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Ross Dress for Less Virginia, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Levin v. Pritchard IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.