Legal Opinion

Katz v. Katz

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage.

The defendants William Klein and Maria M. Klein contest the plaintiff’s demand for a deficiency judgment against them.

Section 249 of the Beal Property Law provides: “A mortgage of real property does not imply a covenant for the payment of the sum intended to be secured; and where such covenant is not expressed in the mortgage, or a bond or other separate instrument to secure such *171payment has not been given, the remedies of the mortgagee are confined to the property mentioned in the mortgage. ’ ’

This provision relates to the clauses set forth in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elder v. RouseNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Consumers Brewing Co. v. BraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quackenbush v. QuackenbushNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API