Handel v. Handel
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*855The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative on the ground that respondent-appellant failed to move for a protective order under CPLR 3122 or to show 'cause why his failure to so move was excusable (Zeif v. Zeif, 31 A D 2d 625; Coffey v. Orbachs, Inc., 22 A D 2d 317, 319-320), and neither the Appellate Division nor the Family Court exercised discretion to excuse compliance with CPLR 3122, a discretion which either court undoubtedly had. No other issue is passed upon.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi,…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Eisen v. EisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Hirsch v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Hoppl v. HopplAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Best v. BarasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Chariff v. CarlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.