Legal Opinion

Handel v. Handel

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1970PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*855The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative on the ground that respondent-appellant failed to move for a protective order under CPLR 3122 or to show 'cause why his failure to so move was excusable (Zeif v. Zeif, 31 A D 2d 625; Coffey v. Orbachs, Inc., 22 A D 2d 317, 319-320), and neither the Appellate Division nor the Family Court exercised discretion to excuse compliance with CPLR 3122, a discretion which either court undoubtedly had. No other issue is passed upon.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi,…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Eisen v. EisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Hirsch v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Hoppl v. HopplAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Best v. BarasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Chariff v. CarlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API