Legal Opinion

Ross v. Utter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This cause was heard before Peters, Judge, at November term, 1853, of the Fulton Circuit Court, and a decree rendered for the complainant Utter. Ross took this appeal.

Read the full summary

This cause was heard before Peters, Judge, at November term, 1853, of the Fulton Circuit Court, and a decree rendered for the complainant Utter. Ross took this appeal. The bill avers, that on September 12, 1848, Hamilton B. Patterson and Joel B. Patterson made their note for $128, payable on the 1st day of March, 1851, to James R. Sharp; that on the 10th day of March, 1850, the payee assigned it to the complainant; and that at the time of such assignment, one Joseph L. Sharp guaranteed the collection of the note; the note is dated September 2d, 1848. That at the time of the execution of the…

1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.

This was a suit in chancery, brought by Utter against Ross, for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The bill alleged in substance, that in September, 1848, H. B. & J. B. Patterson made their promissory note to J. R. Sharp for $128, payable in March, 1851, and that the payee, in March, 1850, assigned the same by indorsement in writing to the complainant; that the Pattersons also executed a mortgage to Sharp, to secure the payment of eight notes, including the one held by the complainant; that in March, 1851, the Pattersons conveyed the mortgaged premises to the defendant, who had since had the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Peoria v. JohnstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Bryan v. City of East St. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API