Bayard v. Lathy
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois
At law.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP
THE COURT.
This was an action of assumpsit against the defendant, as acceptor of two hills of exchange, for $1,000 each, dated Dec. 13, 1838, drawn on the defendant, in favor of plaintiff, at Pitts-burg, where plaintiff resides, by one James Gonsalis. [Verdict for plaintiff.]
Issue was joined on the defendant’s plea of nonassumpsit, and a jury impanneled to try the same. The plaintiff gave in evidence to the jury the following letter, written by the defendant to the said Gonsalis, the drawer of the bills in question:
“Upper Alton, Oct. 12, 1838. James Gon-salis, Esq.: Dear Sir—You are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Reimsdyk v. KaneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1813
- Ontario Bank v. WorthingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Wilson v. ClementsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Goodrich & De Forest v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Parker v. GreeleNew York Supreme Court · 1829
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beach v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
- Anderson County Deposit Bank v. Turner-Looker Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1894