People v. Villarino
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial, and an order refusing to arrest the judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
1. The information laid against the defendant charged him with having feloniously assaulted one Raphael Soto with a deadly weapon, to wit, a loaded pistol, with intent to kill and murder him, the said Soto. This, in connection with the averments of time and place, which are properly pleaded, constituted a sufficient statement of the offense charged (People v. Jacobs, 29 Cal. 579 ; People v. Congleton, 44 Cal. 93 ; People v. Lightner, 49 Cal. 226 ; People v. Lewis, 61 Cal. 366), and as in other respects the information conformed to the requirements of §§ 950, 951 and 952, Penal Code, it was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. McCroryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- People v. Jim TiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. LightnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. StaplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. KuselWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. KinsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.