Legal Opinion

Becker v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 20, 1925No. 267PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We first inquire whether plaintiff, after having made the report he did, can maintain this action.

The mere making of a report is in itself nothing; it is the language thereof that counts. Schall v. Miller (C. C. A.) 287 F. 502. The report in the case cited was drawn with more care than the one at bar; for, if the report in this ease be taken as a voluntary performance on the part of the plaintiff, the result he then admitted is in the teeth of the facts he now alleges. On this point it is to be remembered that plaintiff and Peters were practically eafied to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. HerzfeldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  2. Schall v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Henkels v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Komar v. General Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API