Legal Opinion
United States v. Kazys Ciurinskas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 19, 1998No. 97-3067PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Why would a person, who became a naturalized citizen of this country after World War II, apply for a war pension from the German government and at the same time expect us to believe that he did not lie on his various applications for entry into this country, applications which do not mention that he ever served in any military force, say nothing of one entitling him to a German war pension? But that is what Kazys Ciurinskas, a naturalized citizen originally from Lithuania, expects of us. He appeals from the decision of the district court, Judge James Moody,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Liudas Kairys, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. CiurinskasDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Anton TittjungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- John Doe v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Osyp FirishchakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Juozas Naujalis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.