Pinson v. Schmalz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action for money had and received for the use of the plaintiff. Judgment for defendant, from which, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.
The facts upon which plaintiff’s demand is founded are substantially as follows: —
On July 15, 1888, the plaintiff, then residing at Ocos, Guatemala, shipped to defendant in San Francisco, by steamer, sixty-one sacks of coffee in his own name as shipper, but for account of Messrs. Kunze & Duran, of Guatemala, with whom defendant had dealings, and a previous u iderstanding that they were to ship their cof*652fee…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900