Anderson v. Frischkorn Real Estate Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The declaration avers rescission of subscriptions to purchase shares of capital stock of defendant, and is for recovery back of the money paid. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Defendant brings error.
No witnesses were called by defendant. There is evidence that subscriptions were induced by fraud of an agent of defendant. Certificates for the shares were made, and have been held by defendant as collateral to plaintiff’s purchase money notes. The record is that, at the time of bringing this suit, the stock had no market value.
1. Rescission. It was upon plaintiff before suit to restore, or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Witte v. HobolthMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Joslin v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Pangborn v. RuemenappMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Southern Traction Co. v. HulbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chapin v. CullisMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Newton Realty Co. v. FilecciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- National Bank of Detroit v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Thompson v. American State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- In re Taxes EstateHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.