Legal Opinion

Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. Autoscope, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1963No. 3288Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Appellant obtained a judgment against Ethel M. and John Manyette and caused a garnishment to be issued against “Sure Fit Seat Covers Inc.” The garnishment was left at one of the branches of Autoscope, Inc., which does business under the name of “Sure-Fit Seat Cover Center.” Autoscope, through its office manager, answered the garnishment, stating that John Manyette was employed by it at a salary of $60 a week.1 In answering however, the office manager merely signed his name and indicated his office, but did not name Auto-scope or indicate in any way that the answer was that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peikin v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API