Legal Opinion

Riley v. Hartman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1998No. 22172PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

Plaintiff and Defendants, owners of adjoining lots in the City of New Madrid, Missouri, apparently disagreed over the boundary line between their property. Subsequently, Plaintiff commenced an action against Defendants seeking a declaration that Plaintiff owns “up to the line fence,” and that “the fence be decreed to be the true line between lands” of the parties. Plaintiff based his claim on adverse possession of the property extending to the fence line.

At trial, the court heard testimony from eight witnesses and received into evidence numerous photographs, deeds, and other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kitterman v. SimrallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Pallardy v. Link's Landing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Massman Construction Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. Mease v. McGuireMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. AAA Bail BondsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Carden v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Snelling v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Pullen v. PullenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Yarnall ex rel. Yarnall v. ChoudhuryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API