Legal Opinion

Custalow v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 18, 2004No. 2303022PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUMPHREYS, Judge.

Charles Bernard Custalow appeals his conviction for trespassing in violation of Code § 18.2-119. Appellant contends that the Mattaponi Indian Tribe improperly barred him from its reservation. Thus, the Commonwealth failed to prove appellant was forbidden to “go[ ] upon or remain upon” the reservation by the “person lawfully in charge thereof.” See Code § 18.2-119. For the reasons that follow, we affirm his conviction.

I. Background

On appeal, we review the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as the party prevailing below.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stamper v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  2. Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  3. Juares v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  4. Anderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Custalow v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API