Legal Opinion

Turchin v. Warton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion should have been granted, for the reasons that the chattel when mortgaged was situated in the city of New York, and the mortgagor was a resident of Westchester county, State of New York. Therefore, the mortgage should have been filed in the county of Westchester as well as in the county where the chattel was located. (See Lien Law, §§ 230 and 232.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present — ■ Martin, P. J., OMalley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marine Midland Trust Co. v. DuganNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ruppert v. Community National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. In re National Browne Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. In re the Benefit of Creditors of National New York Packing & Shipping Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API