Wilson & Toms Investment Co. v. Hillyer
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Stevens District Court. Action by the Wilson & Toms Investment Company against Hillyer and wife, to recover for money expended for the use of defendants. The defendants’ motion to set aside a judgment against them, and grant a new trial, was granted July 2, 1889. The plaintiff comes to this court. As bearing generally on this case we cite: Hill v. Williams, 6 ICas. 17; Laithev.
Read the full summary
Error from Stevens District Court. Action by the Wilson & Toms Investment Company against Hillyer and wife, to recover for money expended for the use of defendants. The defendants’ motion to set aside a judgment against them, and grant a new trial, was granted July 2, 1889. The plaintiff comes to this court. As bearing generally on this case we cite: Hill v. Williams, 6 ICas. 17; Laithev. McDonald, 7 id. 255; Windsor v. Goddard, 15 id. 118; Meixell v. Kirkpatrick, 25 id. 13; Welch v. Challen, 31 id. 696; Fullenweider v. Ewing, 30 id. 15.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
The defendants employed the plaintiff to procure for them a loan upon their preemption filing, which they agreed to secure by mortgage thereon, and authorized it to pay any incumbrance thereon, and also agreed to pay their said agent the sum of $14 as commission for procuring said loan and the expense of examining said land. The company secured the loan, paid the purchase price of the land to the government, amounting to $191, and $10 expense of examining the land, and tendered the defendants the balance of the loan and demanded of them a mortgage for the whole amount of…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Clark v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Rowell v. Cedarvale Oil, Gas & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- State v. LackeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.