Legal Opinion

Victor Cody v. Cindy Sweeney

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 17, 2025No. 2:20-cv-20387Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VICTOR CODY, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 20-20387 (BRM) CINDY SWEENEY, OPINION Respondent. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Petitioner Victor Cody’s (“Petitioner”) amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (“Amended Petition”) brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 10.) Following an order to answer (ECF No. 11), Respondent Cindy Sweeney (“Respondent”) filed a response to the petition (ECF No. 16) and Petitioner did not file a reply. Having reviewed and considered, for the reasons set…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API