Victor Cody v. Cindy Sweeney
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VICTOR CODY, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 20-20387 (BRM) CINDY SWEENEY, OPINION Respondent. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Petitioner Victor Cody’s (“Petitioner”) amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (“Amended Petition”) brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 10.) Following an order to answer (ECF No. 11), Respondent Cindy Sweeney (“Respondent”) filed a response to the petition (ECF No. 16) and Petitioner did not file a reply. Having reviewed and considered, for the reasons set…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.