Legal Opinion

Weikamp v. United States Department of the Navy

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 29, 2016No. Case No.: 1:14 CV 22PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Currently pending before the court is Plaintiff James Weikamp’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion for Fees”) (ECF No. 28). Plaintiff maintains that he is entitled to an award of fees and costs against Defendant United States Department of the Navy (“Navy” or “Defendant”) in the amount of $61,352.18. For the following reasons, the court denies Plaintiffs Motion for Fees.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A more thorough recitation of the facts appears in the court’s Order dated September 24, 2014.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beatrice Maynard v. Central Intelligence Agency, Beatrice Maynard v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Herbert L. Fenster v. Harold Brown, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. George E. Blue, Cross-Appellant v. Bureau of Prisons, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Burka v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Joseph Falcone v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lisa Garrett, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate Of Nathan Alexander Garrett v. Morgan County Sheriff’s Office, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API