Garza v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
In this accelerated appeal, we decide whether, on the record before us, the district court was required to dismiss the underlying suit affecting parental rights for failure to comply with the timing requirements of family code section 263.401. We conclude that it was not, and affirm the district court’s judgment of termination.
BACKGROUND
On November 17, 2003, the Department filed a petition to terminate Dyana Garza’s parental rights to four children — A.G., N.G., J.R.D.E., and J.P.E.1 See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 262.205(a) (West 2002). On November 24, 2003, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. Mega Child Care, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Gables Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Travis Central Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Citizens Bank of Bryan v. First State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re L.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- In Re DM, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- in the Interest of T.D.S.T. and C.T., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
- In Re TDST, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
- Garza v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.