Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1953No. 32728Published

1DissentChief Justice Schaefer

It is important at the outset to state the actual question before us. It is whether Mississippi, in the light of all of the operations in which it engages in Illinois, is a public utility under section 10-3 of the act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1951, chap, mji, par. 10.3,) which defines a public utility as “every corporation * * * that now or hereafter: (a) May own, control, operate or manage, within the State, directly or indirectly, for public use, any plant, equipment or property used or to be used for * * * the production, storage, transmission, sale, delivery or furnishing of heat, cold, light,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Missouri Ex Rel. Barrett v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. The Pipe Line CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API