Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. Bondex, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 25, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-203326; No. 5173Published

1DissentLockemy, J.

I concur with the majority that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Appellate Panel’s finding that Lee suffered a work-related accident. I also agree that we cannot review a decision that has not been made with regard to any remaining alleged injuries. However, I respectfully disagree with their decision to affirm the Appellate Panel’s conclusion that Lee was entitled to temporary total disability. I do not believe the Appellate Panel made the necessary findings of fact for this court to determine the issue.

The Appellate Panel found Lee was not offered light duty work…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Colvin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. Keeter v. CLIFTON MFG. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. Coleman v. Quality Concrete Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Fox v. Newberry County Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Smith v. NCCI, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API