Legal Opinion

Cuagliotti v. Mesa, City of

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 6, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02970Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Carl Cuagliotti, No. CV-24-02970-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Mesa, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). 16 (Doc. 2). 17 I. Legal Standards 18 A. Ability to Pay 19 “There is no formula set forth by statute, regulation, or case law to determine when 20 someone is poor enough to earn IFP status.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1235 21 (9th Cir. 2015). “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is sufficient where it…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API