Legal Opinion

Hoenstine v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 1999No. 99-6PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDauksch, J.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellee, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, moves for rehearing of this court’s order granting the motion of appellants, James and Kathi Hoenstine, for appellate attorney’s fees. This is ap-pellee’s second motion for rehearing. In its motion, appellee argues that this court’s denial of its first motion for rehearing was erroneous on the ground that its motion should not have been deemed untimely filed. Appellee erroneously relies upon Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c) which provides that review of orders rendered by the lower tribunal shall be by motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allstar Builders Corp., Inc. v. ZimmermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API