Bayer v. Walsh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 272, Oct. T., 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Go., Oct. T., 1893, No. 383, on a verdict for. the plaintiff. Ejectment for four-fifteenths interest in land.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 272, Oct. T., 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Go., Oct. T., 1893, No. 383, on a verdict for. the plaintiff. Ejectment for four-fifteenths interest in land. Before Ma-gee, J. In addition to the facts stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court, Alice Walsh testified as follows: “Q. Under the privilege accorded you in that will you may state whether or not you purchased your brother Edward’s share in that property? A. I did purchase his share. Q. When did you purchase it ? A. Edward’s—on the 31st of October, 1892. Q. On the 31st of October, 1892? A. Yes,…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Chief Justice Stebbett,
It is admitted that Patrick McMullen, whom both parties recognize as the common source of title, died seized of the lot in controversy October 19, 1892; and that, by his last will, dated October 1, 1890, and probated October 29, 1892, he *42devised said lot as follows: “ I give and devise my residence on Brownsville avenue, with lot' 37 feet front by 120 feet deep, .... valued at $3,000, to my daughter, Alice Walsh, and my sons, Edward McMullen and Joseph McMullen, to be divided in shares, thus: Alice $1,200, Edward $800, and Joseph $1,000, to hold to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Mack v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
- Delone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Delone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Fenstermaker's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lehigh County · 1924
- Hassel EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lancaster County · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.