Legal Opinion
Harvey Aluminum v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1964No. 18273PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board issued a complaint charging that petitioners engaged in an unfair labor practice 1 by maintaining surveillance of union activities of employees of Harvey Aluminum and General Engineering, Inc., through undercover operatives of the Wallace Detective and Security Agency. Petitioners admitted the surveillance, but insisted that its only object was to detect and prevent pilferage of company property.
Evidence relating to the central issue thus created was in direct and irreconcilable conflict. Two government witnesses (a former Wallace…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Trane Co. v. KlutznickDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- United States v. BosticDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1972