Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Oakes' Estate v. Oakes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 1, 1933No. 13656Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Bonham

(concurring) : I concur in the result of the opinion of the Chief Justice in this case, but I desire to emphasize my view of one phase of the main question involved in the appeal.

It is possible, indeed probable, that the opinion of this Court in the case of In Re Willcox (Ellis’ Estate v. Brown), 162 S. C., 133, 160 S. E., 260, may have led Judges of Probate and the fiduciaries named in Section «9050, Code 1932, to the erroneous conclusion that the approval therein required of the Judge of Probate of deposits in banks of funds in the hands of such fiduciaries might be had after, as well as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ellis Estate v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API