Legal Opinion

Edward Cutter, II v. David Seror

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 8, 2011No. 09-60014UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Edward Williams Cutter, II (“Edward”), the debtor, and John F. Cutter, as guardian ad litem for Trip Cutter, Edward’s son, appeal from the opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s determination that the Edward Williams Cutter, 2d Inter-Vivos Trust dated May 23, 1998 (the “Trust”), was a “self-settled trust” under California law and that Edward’s creditors could reach all of the Trust assets contributed by Edward. In re Cutter, 398 B.R. 6, 20-21 (9th Cir. B.A.P.2008). We affirm the Bankruptcy Court. 1

We review the Bankruptcy Court’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Steven Gregory Bammer, Debtor. James M. Murray v. Steven Gregory BammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Cutter v. Seror (In Re Cutter)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trauner v. Thadikamalla (In re Thadikamalla)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
  2. In re: Chad Paul DelannoyUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. In re: Frances Diane TothUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Steve William NolanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API