Legal Opinion

Gibson v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1966No. 3887, 3888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge:

Appellants were convicted of misdemeanors in separate nonjury trials, and each was sentenced to a short jail term. The parties agree that prior to arraignment only two questions were asked by the trial judge- — -“Do you have a lawyer?” and “Do you want a lawyer?” — and that after receiving a simple “No” to both, he proceeded with their trials. These appeals raise the question of whether appellants were sufficiently advised of their right to counsel so as to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution and the rules of the trial court.

The Sixth Amendment provides: “In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Pierce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. ManikasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API