Legal Opinion

Laing v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1988PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff commenced an action against the City of New York and Lydia Dunbar alleging that on July 2, 1983 he was injured when he tripped and fell on a negligently maintained sidewalk in front of Dunbar’s home in Queens. He pleaded that he had satisfied the notice requirement of the "Pothole Law” for actions against the City (Administrative Code of City of New York § 7-201 [c] [2]). At trial, plaintiff’s counsel asserted in his opening statement that the defective condition had existed since 1971;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doremus v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Bruni v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Conlon v. Village of PleasantvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Buccellato v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API