Laing v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff commenced an action against the City of New York and Lydia Dunbar alleging that on July 2, 1983 he was injured when he tripped and fell on a negligently maintained sidewalk in front of Dunbar’s home in Queens. He pleaded that he had satisfied the notice requirement of the "Pothole Law” for actions against the City (Administrative Code of City of New York § 7-201 [c] [2]). At trial, plaintiff’s counsel asserted in his opening statement that the defective condition had existed since 1971;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Doremus v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by22 opinions
- Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bruni v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Conlon v. Village of PleasantvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Buccellato v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.