Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. v. John David, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint. This, court in Cushman & Wakefield v. John David, Inc. (23 A D 2d 827) granted a motion to dismiss the second and third causes of action of the original complaint because of insufficiency; but with the leave to plaintiff to apply at Special Term, pursuant to CPLE 3211 (subd. [e]), to serve an amended complaint. The question before us is whether the plaintiff, upon its application for leave to serve an amended complaint, has complied with CPLB 3211 (subd. [e].) by submitting not only a proposed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Four Seasons Hotels Ltd. v. VinnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Mathiesen v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Morgan v. Prospect Park Associates Holdings, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Castillo v. Henry Schein, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.