Buhl Land Co. v. Franklin Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Plaintiff lessor sued defendant, assignee of the lessees, for certain instalments of rent and for remainder due on a demand arising upon agreement between lessor and lessees for remodeling the premises, a room in the Buhl building, Detroit. Defendant prevailed in a trial without a jury. Plaintiff has appealed.
The lease, made April 6, 1925, provides against assigning by the lessees without written consent of the lessor, with right of forfeiture for breach. The lessees, Stephens and VanPoperin, in September, 1925, assigned all interest under the lease to defendant, a corporation. It occupied…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Lee v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
- Darmstaetter v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Mayer v. DwigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George Realty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Plaza Investment Co. v. AbelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Riverbend Investors v. Progressive Surface Preparation, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Detroit Trust Co. v. MortensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Burghard v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935