Harvard Investment Co. v. Smith
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered March 14, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for rent, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
The main point in this case is whether the respondents are bound by the terms of a written lease made by the appellant to one Mary A. O’Reilly. The original lease was made for a term beginning October 1, 1907, and ending September SO, 1910. By it, O’Reilly became bounden to pay the full sum of $16,150, payable, after the first month’s rental of $400, at the rate of $450 per month. It was further covenanted and agreed that O’Reilly would not assign the lease, or any interest therein or any part thereof, without the written assent of the appellant, or its “agents, had -and obtained thereto.” On…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tibbals v. IfflandWashington Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Medgard v. ShimogakiWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- OTR v. Flakey Jake's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Boynton v. Mayor of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Bernheimer v. RezekWashington Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.