Hanawalt v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR to tbe Circuit Court for Waupaca County. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This was an action to charge the plaintiff in error with the support and maintenance of a bastard child. On the trial in the circuit court the state was permitted, against the objection of the plaintiff in error, to bring into court, and exhibit to the jurors for their inspection, as evidence in the case, the child of which he was charged with being the father; such child then being less than one year old. This is assigned as error in this conrt. The plaintiff also assigns as error that the counsel for the state was permitted to comment to the jury and draw their attention to the alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Washburn v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- State Ex Rel. Stubblefield v. WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Warlick v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- State v. DanforthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sherman v. Menominee River Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- McCalman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Clark v. BradstreetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- State v. DanforthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
- Anderson v. AupperleOregon Supreme Court · 1908
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.