McGhee v. Minor
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duokwobth, Justice.
1. While an absolute deed of conveyance will not, at the instance of the grantor, be canceled merely because of a breach by the grantee of a promise made by him, in consideration of which the deed was executed (Brand v. Power, 110 Ga. 522, 36 S. E. 53; Christian v. Ross, 145 Ga. 284, 88 S. E. 986; Moore v. Turner, 146 Ga. 197 (3), 91 S. E. 13), and the remedy of the grantor in such a case is a suit for damages for such breach (Brand v. Power, supra), yet where, as in the instant ease, it is alleged that the grantee is insolvent, and *636.the evidence shows that the forty-nine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Brand v. PowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Christian v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Wyatt v. NailerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- House v. HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Fulton Land Co. v. Armor Insulating Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Hogan v. BrogdonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Hogan v. BrogdonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942