Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Sanders v. Yancey
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1966No. 66-M-448PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.
The relator petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he was ille-gaily inducted into the Army. His principal contention is that upon his enlistment in the National Guard Reserve he should have been reclassified by the Selective Service Board to a class other than 1-A.
FACTS
Feb. 22, 1945 — Date of relator’s birth,
Feb. 28, 1963 — Relator registered with the Selective Service Board. Subsequently he was classified as a student under 2S.
June 1965_Relato]t. in repiy to a questionnaire, stated he was no longer a student hereupon the Board reclassified him in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Richard Secor Corliss, United States of America v. Fred August Heise, United States of America v. Walter HeroldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- American Motor Specialties Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. CorlissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Jerry R. Pickens v. Colonel Weldon W. Cox, Mpc Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Sisquoc Ranch Co. v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Caputo v. SharpDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- United States ex rel. Sanders v. YanceyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. YanceyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966