Legal Opinion

Jay v. Van Bibber

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 6, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from • the Commissioner of the Land’ Office- (E.Stanley Toadvin. )

1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.

This is an appeal from the- action of the Land Commissioner in granting two patents for alleged vacant lands in Harford County. The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal,

• ■ 1st.- Because no caveat has been entered to the application for either of the two special warrants issued, and to the returns thereof, and the certificates of survey, as is required by sec. 38 of Art. 54 of the Code of Public General Laws.

2nd. Because the record does hot show any final order or decree from which an appeal lies.

3rd. Because the record shows no irregularity in any of the proceedings resulting in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Polk's Lessee v. WendalSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. Redman v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  3. Billingsley v. TongueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  4. Jay v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Carlysle v. CarlysleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Melvin v. SchlessingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  2. Spicer v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Wm. H. McCeney, Inc. v. ThibadeauCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Manor Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. SincellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API