Legal Opinion

Russo v. Raimondo

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided October 24, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00186Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DOMINICK RUSSO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION 24-0186-WS-M ) GINA RAIMONDO, etc., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer to a proper venue. (Doc. 17). The plaintiffs have filed a response and the defendants a reply, (Docs. 21, 22), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the motion is due to be denied. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Jenkins Brick Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. John E. Bremer, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, Aaa Spec Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Interval Licensing LLC v. Aol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Woodke v. DahmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Rogers v. Civil Air PatrolDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API