Legal Opinion

Ammerman v. Melnick

Arlington County Circuit Court

Decided September 15, 1975No. Case No. (Law) 18052Published

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE CHARLES H. DUFF

The Motion to Quash the Attachment presents, in my judgment, two basic issues; the first, whether a foreign judgment subject to appeal is entitled to full faith and credit so as to be able to form the basis of an attachment of Virginia assets owing to the judgment debtor, and second, whether the Attachment Petition, Affidavit in support thereof, and Order of Publication are procedurally effective

The annotation in 2 A.L.R.3d 1384 observes that almost without exception judgments from which an appeal has been taken without a supersedeas have been required as final…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Piedmont & Arlington Life Insurance v. RaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  2. Barr v. ThacherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API