Pickell v. Coates
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Barry; Smith, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Charles W. Pickell and Edmond L.. Pickell, copartners as C. W. Pickell & Brother, against Jesse K. Coates upon certain promissory notes. There was judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a special appeal, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiffs placed a claim against the defendant in the hands of a collection agency at Detroit for collection, who sent it to its correspondent, an attorney at Hastings, the home of defendant. He brought an action in justice’s court, but was defeated. He wrote the collection agency without delay, asking if the plaintiffs wished to take an appeal. The letter was received and opened by a lady clerk, who was temporarily acting in the absence of their correspondence clerk, and she neglected to bring the matter to the attention of the manager until a week or so after the statutory period of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Huddleston v. Charles Amos & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Small v. OldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Bocinski v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Mooradian v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Lent v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.