Legal Opinion

State v. Woodard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 1991No. 91-0498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s order that granted appellee’s motion to suppress “based on the officer’s lack of Pounded Suspicion to Conduct an Investigatory Stop of [appellee's] Automobile.” We reverse.

Only Officer Littlefield, a twelve-year police veteran, testified at the suppression hearing. He stated that at about one thirty in the morning on April 9, 1990, he patrolled downtown Fort Lauderdale with his K-9 partner. As he drove by an un-feneed lot located next to a fenced Southern Bell compound, he saw the lower portion of a small vehicle and “a pair of legs” next to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. In re the Interest of M.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. State v. BarrettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API